Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property

Dark abstract geometric shapes creating a layered pattern with gradient shading.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is booming with technology surrounding AI, and generative AI in particular, making enormous progress in recent times. The use of AI is only set to grow at an increasingly fast pace, with more and more applications of this growing technology being announced on an almost daily basis.

Although AI is already being used in almost every sector, it is the enormous global impact of generative AI tools like ChatGPT that has forced it into all our daily lives. Generative AI has quickly been adopted across all industries, assisting IT professionals with coding, preparing content for media companies, and even assisting judges with drafting judgments. Deals for the licensing and use of AI tools for content creation are rapidly growing.

However, the rise and rise of AI has left a series of serious legal uncertainties and potential risks in its wake.

In this hub, we will examine key intellectual property (IP) issues to bear in mind when using or developing AI platforms, including:

  • Protecting underlying algorithms and code via combinations of patents, trade secrets, copyright and other IP rights.
  • Ownership and protection of data used in training AI models, and risks that may arise from unauthorised use.
  • Licensing and other revenue generating models.
  • Usage of open-source software and components.
  • Ownership and protection of outputs from an AI.

All of the above points can be placed into one of three categories: AI training input, the underlying AI algorithms and model, and output produced by an AI model.

For an introduction on how AI works, click here

AI Training Input

The vast majority of modern AI models are trained and developed using input data. AI models need these raw materials to “learn” from, and a steady flow of new input data is often needed to ensure the model can continue to learn and improve, producing increasingly sophisticated and well-informed outputs.

There are ongoing disputes both in the UK and abroad around the use of training data scraped, for example, from the internet, and being used to train AI models without permission. There are also fast developing stories of collaborations between large media entities and large tech companies; Universal Music and YouTube, for example, appear to be partnering in relation to YouTube’s Gen AI for music.

In this section we take a closer look at:

The AI model and its use

As with all inventions, it is important to consider how best to protect a new AI model. Copyright is likely to subsist in the code. In some cases, patents may be an option, particularly if your AI model is built on novel algorithms or methods. Or trade secrets may be a better option if your model contains proprietary algorithms, methods, or other confidential information.

In this section we look at the different protective options open to AI creators and how/when to make best use of each. More specifically we look at:

Output

AI ultimately exists to produce what the user needs.

AI can absorb information from a wide range of sources, and provide output in many different formats depending on a users’ instructions. For example, this can be written content (an everyday example of this is ChatGPT), imagery (such as Stable Diffusion) data analysis, code, or even video and audio.

However, regardless of the content and format of the output, there are various IP-related issues to consider:

Technician with glasses working behind server cables illuminated by green and blue lights.
Man wearing glasses working at a desk using a laptop and a curved monitor displaying lines of code.
Woman in a brown coat using a tablet to control smart home devices in a bright modern kitchen.
Two hands holding a paper with a packaging design sketch and cardboard pieces around.
Two hands holding a paper with a packaging design sketch and cardboard pieces around.

Meet the Team

Dave Clark

Dave Clark

Partner & Board Member - Patent Attorney
Dave Clark
Peter Finnie

Peter Finnie

Partner - Patent Attorney
Peter Finnie
Mark Nichols

Mark Nichols

Senior Associate - IP Solicitor
Mark Nichols
Benjamin Bell

Benjamin Bell

Senior Associate - Patent Attorney
Benjamin Bell
Saiful Khan

Saiful Khan

Partner - Patent Attorney
Saiful Khan
Oliver Laing

Oliver Laing

Partner - IP Solicitor
Oliver Laing
Jesper Sellin

Jesper Sellin

Partner - Attorney at Law
Jesper Sellin
Christopher Hartland

Christopher Hartland

Senior Associate - Patent Attorney
Christopher Hartland
Harrison Lee

Harrison Lee

Senior Associate - Trade Mark Attorney
Harrison Lee
Georgia Carr

Georgia Carr

Senior Associate - IP Solicitor
Georgia Carr
Karina López

Karina López

Associate - Patents
Karina López
Sonja Hyvärinen

Sonja Hyvärinen

Junior Attorney
Sonja Hyvärinen
Ethan Silverstone

Ethan Silverstone

Associate - Patent Attorney
Ethan Silverstone
Georgia Wearing

Georgia Wearing

Trainee Patent Attorney
Georgia Wearing

Related News

Should AI developers be free to train their models on existing copyright works? The UK government is no longer so sure.

Should AI developers be free to train their models on existing copyright works? The UK government is no longer so sure.

Patenting software inventions in Europe: Understanding the need for a technical contribution (2)

Patenting software inventions in Europe: Understanding the need for a technical contribution (2)

Patenting software inventions in Europe: Understanding the need for a technical contribution (1)

Patenting software inventions in Europe: Understanding the need for a technical contribution (1)

Protecting trade secrets in the age of AI: Lessons learnt from the theft of Google trade secrets

Protecting trade secrets in the age of AI: Lessons learnt from the theft of Google trade secrets

Innovating Intellectual Property: Spotlight on Dave Clark, Partner at Potter Clarkson

Innovating Intellectual Property: Spotlight on Dave Clark, Partner at Potter Clarkson

Sustainability and digitalization are driving transportation innovation reports WIPO

Sustainability and digitalization are driving transportation innovation reports WIPO

How can AI help make construction more sustainable?

How can AI help make construction more sustainable?

Changes to the UKIPO's approach to AI-based inventions

Changes to the UKIPO's approach to AI-based inventions

See All Related News

Get in Touch with Our AI Team

Steve Smith
Chris Cadman
David Carling
Dave Clark
Charlotte Crowhurst

Potter Clarkson’s specialist electronics and communications team includes a number of attorneys with extensive experience in software, and AI inventions. If we can help you with an issue relating to the protection and commercialisation of innovation in any area artificial intelligence, please get in touch.

Thank you.
Your details have been submitted.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.